Think Like A Human!

Michael Mann, from the innovation Foundation NESTA makes the case for collaborative problem solving.

Every generation has a responsibility to ask what skills and knowledge are most essential for children to learn. Some necessary and fundamental skills will change little over time- like being able to read and write, or master maths. Others will change depending on technological developments and the requirements of an evolving jobs market. The education system should prepare every young person for the world of work and enable them to fulfil their potential as active and happy members of society.

Create an account to read this article

£7.00+ VAT

One-off purchase

Purchase and Download today

Register for free

No Credit Card required

Register for free
Access to 3 free articles
Free TeachingTimes Report every month

array(8) {
  ["distinct_key"]=>
  string(10) "post#42875"
  ["title"]=>
  string(16) "Flipped Learning"
  ["categories"]=>
  array(1) {
    [0]=>
    string(10) "Leadership"
  }
  ["url"]=>
  string(54) "https://www.teachingtimes.com/flipped-learning_010216/"
  ["post_date_timestamp"]=>
  int(1453999782)
  ["objectID"]=>
  string(12) "post-42875-0"
  ["_snippetResult"]=>
  array(2) {
    ["excerpt"]=>
    array(2) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(357) "This study, undertaken by NFER and NESTA, revealed both benefits and challenges of implementing a flipped learning approach to mathematics teaching. It explored the bene?ts and the practical considerations of using video resources in implementing a new approach to teaching and learning in schools.
Leadership Briefings 10.07(115)"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
    }
    ["content"]=>
    array(2) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(479) "... LEARNINGKeywordsFlipped learning,implementing,benefits,challenges,digitaltechnology,classroom,teacher,teaching,learning, onlineresourcesSummaryThis study, undertaken by NFER and NESTA, revealed both benefits and challenges ofimplementing a flipped learning approach to mathematics teaching. It explored the bene?tsand the practical considerations of using video resources in implementing a new approach toteaching and learning ..."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
    }
  }
  ["_highlightResult"]=>
  array(4) {
    ["title"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(25) "Flipped Learning"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
      ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(1) {
        [0]=>
        string(8) "learning"
      }
    }
    ["excerpt"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(357) "This study, undertaken by NFER and NESTA, revealed both benefits and challenges of implementing a flipped learning approach to mathematics teaching. It explored the bene?ts and the practical considerations of using video resources in implementing a new approach to teaching and learning in schools.
Leadership Briefings 10.07(115)"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
      ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(2) {
        [0]=>
        string(8) "learning"
        [1]=>
        string(5) "nesta"
      }
    }
    ["content"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(5779) "Leadership BriefingLeadership Briefing – www.teachingtimes.comReports Summaries – a weeklyservice of essential summaries,in-depth reports and criticalanalysis that’s new and relevantto education, linked to originalsource documents.FLIPPED LEARNINGKeywordsFlipped learning,implementing,benefits,challenges,digitaltechnology,classroom,teacher,teaching,learning, onlineresourcesSummaryThis study, undertaken by NFER and NESTA, revealed both benefits and challenges ofimplementing a flipped learning approach to mathematics teaching. It explored the bene?tsand the practical considerations of using video resources in implementing a new approach toteaching and learning in schools.Flipped learning involves the use of digital technology, such as video, to provide direct instructionon new concepts outside of the classroom. Students come to lessons already having a preliminaryunderstanding of the topic, freeing up class time for the teacher to focus on other beneficial learningactivities.Teachers were asked to use Khan Academy mathematics resources in their delivery of ?ippedlearning. They were provided with a guide to implementing the approach and documents whichmapped the Khan Academy resources to the relevant curricula.The study suggests that there may be scope for teachers to further re?ne and enhance models of?ipped learning beyond those developed as part of this short pilot study. This could include more useof: student-centred and peer-teaching activities; research and problemsolving; extended discussion;and assessment and feedback informed by performance on online activities.A number of features evident in the nine case-study schools distinguish a ?ipped learning approachfrom more traditional teaching approaches: ■ Homework time is typically used to deliver new content to prepare students for lessons, asopposed to being used for revision and consolidation. ■ Greater use is made of online learning such as videos, presentations and exercises thanof?ine learning such as textbooks and worksheets. ■ Teachers spend more time in lessons coaching and facilitating learning and less timeproviding whole class instruction and demonstration.Key Findings: ■ Where flipped learning was reported to work effectively, there was more time in class for activelearning activities, such as: practising and applying mathematical knowledge; individualisedcoaching support provided by the teacher; collaborative learning; and whole-class discussion ■ Flipped learning encouraged students to take responsibility for their learning, to learn at their ownpace, to deepen their knowledge and understanding and to make faster progress than wouldWeek Commencing 1st February 2016http://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/NESM01/NESM01.pdfhttps://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/359483/DFE-RR286_-_Are_free_schools_using_innovative_approaches.pdfLeadership BriefingLeadership Briefing – www.teachingtimes.comReports Summaries – a weeklyservice of essential summaries,in-depth reports and criticalanalysis that’s new and relevantto education, linked to originalsource documents.otherwise have been the case ■ Enabling factors and challenges included access to technology, homework culture,appropriateness of online resources to the age and ability level of students and teachers’openness to the approach and capacity to implement it ■ Most teachers in the study intended to continue using flipped learning, or aspects of it, as part of avaried repertoire of teaching strategies and to develop its potential further.Conclusions: ■ Access to computers or mobile devices and Wi-Fi at home needs to be considered (and withinschool if students will also be accessing resources during school time). This may involve someconsultation with students to gauge their home access. Consideration may need to be given touse of smart phones or the loan of laptops where students do not have access at home. ■ When choosing resources, it is important to check to what extent they match the curriculum andtopic. Resources that provide teacher feedback on the activities that students have completed athome and how they have progressed (such as Khan Academy) provide useful feedback to drawon when planning lessons. ■ The video and digital resources that are available can be used for both ?ipped learning and alsofor revision and recapping content that has already been taught. Material that is less scaffoldedand more complex may be more suitable for revision and extension purposes. ■ If the school does not have an embedded homework policy that results in a high level ofengagement with homework, schools need to institute this before they embark on ?ippedlearning. Otherwise, schools could consider approaches such as opening up access tocomputers during break or lunchtime, running a session in a computer suite facilitated by a non-specialist teacher or teaching assistant, or enabling students to use the online resources duringlesson time. In addition, parents/carers can be involved to help facilitate the process and helpensure homework is completed ■ The attainment level, maturity and ability to work independently of the student group should beconsidered. Teachers in the pilot schools tended to target more able students but this does notneed to be the case. For students with more basic levels of understanding of concepts andless con?dence in working independently, it will be important to consider how their learning isscaffolded to ensure that they are not put off by a lack of appropriate explanation and activitiesthat are of too high"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "full"
      ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(4) {
        [0]=>
        string(10) "assessment"
        [1]=>
        string(13) "collaborative"
        [2]=>
        string(8) "learning"
        [3]=>
        string(5) "nesta"
      }
    }
    ["categories"]=>
    array(1) {
      [0]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(10) "Leadership"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Leadership

Flipped Learning

28 Jan 2016

array(8) {
  ["distinct_key"]=>
  string(10) "post#43674"
  ["title"]=>
  string(45) "Resolving the row over early years technology"
  ["categories"]=>
  array(4) {
    [0]=>
    string(20) "Assistive Technology"
    [1]=>
    string(20) "Information Literacy"
    [2]=>
    string(13) "Special Needs"
    [3]=>
    string(24) "Teaching With Technology"
  }
  ["url"]=>
  string(59) "https://www.teachingtimes.com/ecj61-early-years-technology/"
  ["post_date_timestamp"]=>
  int(1497961622)
  ["objectID"]=>
  string(12) "post-43674-1"
  ["_snippetResult"]=>
  array(2) {
    ["excerpt"]=>
    array(2) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(154) "Providers are divided over how effective technology is in the early years. Elpida Ahtaridou and Dr. Sue Bodman cite the research to propose a way forward."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "none"
    }
    ["content"]=>
    array(2) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(385) "... offer solutions for inclusion and equity of access, particularly for children from socio-economically disadvantaged families. Given the conclusions of scientific research that suggest supporting learning in early childhood provides greater returns in later life, we might conclude that the earlier the integration of technology and learning happens the better ..."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
    }
  }
  ["_highlightResult"]=>
  array(6) {
    ["title"]=>
    array(3) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(45) "Resolving the row over early years technology"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "none"
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
    }
    ["author"]=>
    array(1) {
      [0]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(10) "Sue Bodman"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
    }
    ["excerpt"]=>
    array(3) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(154) "Providers are divided over how effective technology is in the early years. Elpida Ahtaridou and Dr. Sue Bodman cite the research to propose a way forward."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "none"
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
    }
    ["content"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(5654) "this study researchers introduced iPads to a primary school reception centre, a children’s centre and a special school and suggested that technology has the potential to support different mediums used to support literacy such as stories and importantly personalization. iPads had a positive impact on literacy development and provided an array of opportunities for children and teachers to speak and listen to each other. Currently, a collaboration between The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Tufts and Georgia State Universities is trying to understand the impact that technology (tablets in particular) might have in supporting reading preparedness of children between four and eleven years old in under-resourced educational settings in Africa, the United States and slums in India. Findings are promising, showing that a platform to deliver reading content can benefit students across diverse under-resourced educational settings. Despite challenges faced by each study population (i.e., no access to schools; or schools with 50-100:1 student-teacher ratios in developing countries; or low socio-economic at-risk communities in developed countries), three independent literacy and vocabulary pilot assessments suggest better student performance overall. This includes better letter and word recognition, when compared to similar grade students who did not have access to the tablets (Breazeal et al, 2016, p.19). In the same realm, a study of pre-schoolers in Australia who had greater access to touch screens were found to have higher letter and sound knowledge and name writing skills than those without (Nuemann, 2014).Furthermore, a study exploring the attentiveness, impulsivity, learning and emotional effects of touch screen environments on children aged four to seven showed that the introduction of digital devices resulted in no difference in the concentration spans and problem-solving capabilities of children compared to the use of traditional toys, such as drawing or playing with building blocks (Kilman, 2015). As regards the array of arguments put forward by a number research studies that technology distracts from physical play and social interaction, according to research by Plowan et all in 2012, these are not necessarily valid.  Conclusion Investment in technology seems to offer solutions for inclusion and equity of access, particularly for children from socio-economically disadvantaged families. Given the conclusions of scientific research that suggest supporting learning in early childhood provides greater returns in later life, we might conclude that the earlier the integration of technology and learning happens the better. Despite the potential, aspiration and hope for technology’s contribution to tangibly raise the achievement of basic skills such as reading, this has not been matched by initiatives to explore possibilities and test outcomes in Early Years settings. The use of technology in classrooms can have a positive impact if it is used effectively; to a large extent this will be dependent on the quality of teaching. Effective schools will be able to use technology more effectively, less effective schools will not necessarily be able to fulfil its full potential. Technology can act as a catalyst for powerful change. Progress is about focusing on how we can bring that change about and how it can be practically delivered. Siraj-Blatchford and Siraj-Blatchford (2000) and the research by the Education Endowment Foundation (2012) offer the following useful directions, which can provide a framework for implementing and developing technology in the early years setting: Ensure an educational purpose – Uses of technology can be as simple as the use of a telephone to promote imaginary play, the benefits of which are well documented. Applications should promote children in a range of different areas, including creativity, self-expression and language. Siraj-Blatchford and Siraj-Blatchford refer to the Millie’s ‘Make a bug’ application and particularly emphasise the benefits of its free-play mode. They raise concerns however, about applications which are designed with narrow educational aims such as use of language and drill-and-practice programmes which, they say are too teacher directed and appeal to children’s’ extrinsic motivation, i.e. praise by an adult or a smile, etc.Promote collaborative use – Technology can inspire communication not restrict it.  Children using an application together requires their joint attention and sharing. It offers the opportunity for children to use argumentation and resolve any potential conflict; for younger children the intervention of an adult will ensure effective use.Integrate with other aspects of the curriculum to enhance learning – The use of technology should be part of other learning activities and play rather than a separate activity completed in a separate room full of computers. Integrating technology can also provide a greater range of visual and audio artefacts than a nursery might usually hold. Siraj-Blatchford and Siraj-Blatchford provide a powerful example of a child in a nursery who was unable to read but astounded nursery staff when he found a website that showed a live link to an owl’s nest and watched owl babies being fed and cared for by parent owls for the whole morning. As part of the curriculum, professional development for introducing technology seems to be successful when used about 3 times a week if not for more than a period of about 5 – 10 weeks. It can be"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "full"
      ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(4) {
        [0]=>
        string(10) "assessment"
        [1]=>
        string(13) "collaborative"
        [2]=>
        string(8) "learning"
        [3]=>
        string(5) "nesta"
      }
    }
    ["categories"]=>
    array(4) {
      [0]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(20) "Assistive Technology"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [1]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(20) "Information Literacy"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [2]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(13) "Special Needs"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [3]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(24) "Teaching With Technology"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
    }
    ["tags"]=>
    array(3) {
      [0]=>
      array(4) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(25) "Digital Learning"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(7) "partial"
        ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
        bool(false)
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(1) {
          [0]=>
          string(8) "learning"
        }
      }
      [1]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(11) "early years"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [2]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(10) "technology"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Assistive Technology

Resolving the row over early years technology

20 Jun 2017

array(8) {
  ["distinct_key"]=>
  string(10) "post#43783"
  ["title"]=>
  string(43) "Are children ever too young for technology?"
  ["categories"]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(10) "Leadership"
    [1]=>
    string(24) "Teaching With Technology"
    [2]=>
    string(10) "Technology"
  }
  ["url"]=>
  string(65) "https://www.teachingtimes.com/slt82-canchildrenbetooyoungfortech/"
  ["post_date_timestamp"]=>
  int(1506431172)
  ["objectID"]=>
  string(12) "post-43783-1"
  ["_snippetResult"]=>
  array(2) {
    ["excerpt"]=>
    array(2) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(154) "Providers are divided over how effective technology is in the early years. Elpida Ahtaridou and Dr. Sue Bodman cite the research to propose a way forward."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "none"
    }
    ["content"]=>
    array(2) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(385) "... offer solutions for inclusion and equity of access, particularly for children from socio-economically disadvantaged families. Given the conclusions of scientific research that suggest supporting learning in early childhood provides greater returns in later life, we might conclude that the earlier the integration of technology and learning happens the better ..."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
    }
  }
  ["_highlightResult"]=>
  array(5) {
    ["title"]=>
    array(3) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(43) "Are children ever too young for technology?"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "none"
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
    }
    ["author"]=>
    array(2) {
      [0]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(16) "Elpida Ahtaridou"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [1]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(10) "Sue Bodman"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
    }
    ["excerpt"]=>
    array(3) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(154) "Providers are divided over how effective technology is in the early years. Elpida Ahtaridou and Dr. Sue Bodman cite the research to propose a way forward."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "none"
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
    }
    ["content"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(5649) "study researchers introduced iPads to a primary school reception centre, a children’s centre and a special school and suggested that technology has the potential to support different mediums used to support literacy such as stories and importantly personalization. iPads had a positive impact on literacy development and provided an array of opportunities for children and teachers to speak and listen to each other. Currently, a collaboration between The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Tufts and Georgia State Universities is trying to understand the impact that technology (tablets in particular) might have in supporting reading preparedness of children between four and eleven years old in under-resourced educational settings in Africa, the United States and slums in India. Findings are promising, showing that a platform to deliver reading content can benefit students across diverse under-resourced educational settings. Despite challenges faced by each study population (i.e., no access to schools; or schools with 50-100:1 student-teacher ratios in developing countries; or low socio-economic at-risk communities in developed countries), three independent literacy and vocabulary pilot assessments suggest better student performance overall. This includes better letter and word recognition, when compared to similar grade students who did not have access to the tablets (Breazeal et al, 2016, p.19). In the same realm, a study of pre-schoolers in Australia who had greater access to touch screens were found to have higher letter and sound knowledge and name writing skills than those without (Nuemann, 2014).Furthermore, a study exploring the attentiveness, impulsivity, learning and emotional effects of touch screen environments on children aged four to seven showed that the introduction of digital devices resulted in no difference in the concentration spans and problem-solving capabilities of children compared to the use of traditional toys, such as drawing or playing with building blocks (Kilman, 2015). As regards the array of arguments put forward by a number research studies that technology distracts from physical play and social interaction, according to research by Plowan et all in 2012, these are not necessarily valid.  Conclusion Investment in technology seems to offer solutions for inclusion and equity of access, particularly for children from socio-economically disadvantaged families. Given the conclusions of scientific research that suggest supporting learning in early childhood provides greater returns in later life, we might conclude that the earlier the integration of technology and learning happens the better. Despite the potential, aspiration and hope for technology’s contribution to tangibly raise the achievement of basic skills such as reading, this has not been matched by initiatives to explore possibilities and test outcomes in Early Years settings. The use of technology in classrooms can have a positive impact if it is used effectively; to a large extent this will be dependent on the quality of teaching. Effective schools will be able to use technology more effectively, less effective schools will not necessarily be able to fulfil its full potential. Technology can act as a catalyst for powerful change. Progress is about focusing on how we can bring that change about and how it can be practically delivered. Siraj-Blatchford and Siraj-Blatchford (2000) and the research by the Education Endowment Foundation (2012) offer the following useful directions, which can provide a framework for implementing and developing technology in the early years setting: Ensure an educational purpose – Uses of technology can be as simple as the use of a telephone to promote imaginary play, the benefits of which are well documented. Applications should promote children in a range of different areas, including creativity, self-expression and language. Siraj-Blatchford and Siraj-Blatchford refer to the Millie’s ‘Make a bug’ application and particularly emphasise the benefits of its free-play mode. They raise concerns however, about applications which are designed with narrow educational aims such as use of language and drill-and-practice programmes which, they say are too teacher directed and appeal to children’s’ extrinsic motivation, i.e. praise by an adult or a smile, etc.Promote collaborative use – Technology can inspire communication not restrict it.  Children using an application together requires their joint attention and sharing. It offers the opportunity for children to use argumentation and resolve any potential conflict; for younger children the intervention of an adult will ensure effective use.Integrate with other aspects of the curriculum to enhance learning – The use of technology should be part of other learning activities and play rather than a separate activity completed in a separate room full of computers. Integrating technology can also provide a greater range of visual and audio artefacts than a nursery might usually hold. Siraj-Blatchford and Siraj-Blatchford provide a powerful example of a child in a nursery who was unable to read but astounded nursery staff when he found a website that showed a live link to an owl’s nest and watched owl babies being fed and cared for by parent owls for the whole morning. As part of the curriculum, professional development for introducing technology seems to be successful when used about 3 times a week if not for more than a period of about 5 – 10 weeks. It can be"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "full"
      ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(4) {
        [0]=>
        string(10) "assessment"
        [1]=>
        string(13) "collaborative"
        [2]=>
        string(8) "learning"
        [3]=>
        string(5) "nesta"
      }
    }
    ["categories"]=>
    array(3) {
      [0]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(10) "Leadership"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [1]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(24) "Teaching With Technology"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [2]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(10) "Technology"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Leadership

Are children ever too young for technology?

26 Sep 2017

array(8) {
  ["distinct_key"]=>
  string(10) "post#44543"
  ["title"]=>
  string(21) "Assessment Reimagined"
  ["categories"]=>
  array(9) {
    [0]=>
    string(19) "Arts-Based Learning"
    [1]=>
    string(10) "Assessment"
    [2]=>
    string(22) "Collaborative Learning"
    [3]=>
    string(32) "Creative Teaching & Learning"
    [4]=>
    string(17) "Critical Thinking"
    [5]=>
    string(13) "Deep Learning"
    [6]=>
    string(11) "Imagination"
    [7]=>
    string(20) "Independent Learning"
    [8]=>
    string(15) "Problem-Solving"
  }
  ["url"]=>
  string(51) "https://www.teachingtimes.com/assessmentreimagined/"
  ["post_date_timestamp"]=>
  int(1546947788)
  ["objectID"]=>
  string(12) "post-44543-3"
  ["_snippetResult"]=>
  array(2) {
    ["excerpt"]=>
    array(2) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(353) "Done well, assessment can spark the deepest kind of learning. Yet narrow definitions of assessment persist in education. Mara Krechevsky and Tina Blythe explore how Project Zero is reimagining assessment and share examples of assessment practices that foster learning for both students and teachers."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
    }
    ["content"]=>
    array(2) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(400) "learners. Reggio Emilia, Italy: Reggio Children. Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Sachdeva, A. (2016, September 14). Framing a value-based approach to documentation and assessment for maker-centered learning. Retrieved from ..."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
    }
  }
  ["_highlightResult"]=>
  array(6) {
    ["title"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(30) "Assessment Reimagined"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
      ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(1) {
        [0]=>
        string(10) "assessment"
      }
    }
    ["author"]=>
    array(2) {
      [0]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(15) "Mara Krechevsky"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [1]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(11) "Tina Blythe"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
    }
    ["excerpt"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(353) "Done well, assessment can spark the deepest kind of learning. Yet narrow definitions of assessment persist in education. Mara Krechevsky and Tina Blythe explore how Project Zero is reimagining assessment and share examples of assessment practices that foster learning for both students and teachers."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
      ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(2) {
        [0]=>
        string(10) "assessment"
        [1]=>
        string(8) "learning"
      }
    }
    ["content"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(2127) "learners. Reggio Emilia, Italy: Reggio Children. Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Sachdeva, A. (2016, September 14). Framing a value-based approach to documentation and assessment for maker-centered learning. Retrieved from: http://agencybydesign.org.s219538.gridserver.com/value-based-doc-and-assessSeidel, S. (2010). Reflective inquiry in the round. In N. Lyons (Ed.), Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry: Mapping a way of knowing for professional reflective inquiry (pp. 299-313). New York, NY: Springer. Weinbaum, A., Allen, D., Blythe, T., Simon, K., Seidel, S., & Rubin, C. (2004). Teaching as inquiry: Asking hard questions to improve practice and student achievement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Winner, E. (Ed.) (1993). The Arts Propel handbooks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project Zero.Knowledge Trails1. Assessment as an act of lovehttp://library.teachingtimes.com/articles/assessment-as-an-act-of-love-ttcOur system is not geared up to measuring creativity, thinking, confidence and imagination. It simply is not possible to use existing assessment tools to chart children’s progress in achievements which are seemingly intangible but which are more important.2. Putting pupils at the heart of assessmenthttp://library.teachingtimes.com/articles/assessment-pupils-at-the-heartAssessment has to be more than simply pointing out who can do what and who can’t – it has to help pupils progress. Here, the UK’s leading formative assessment expert, Shirley Clarke, looks at the top ways schools are making assessment count for every child.3. Assessing creativity?http://library.teachingtimes.com/articles/assessing-creativityAssessing creativity may seem a contradiction in terms but Becky Lawrence reports that an assessment tool designed by a team at the Centre for Literacy in Primary Education appears to encourage creativity in the classroom."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
      ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(2) {
        [0]=>
        string(10) "assessment"
        [1]=>
        string(8) "learning"
      }
    }
    ["categories"]=>
    array(9) {
      [0]=>
      array(4) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(28) "Arts-Based Learning"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(7) "partial"
        ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
        bool(false)
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(1) {
          [0]=>
          string(8) "learning"
        }
      }
      [1]=>
      array(4) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(19) "Assessment"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(7) "partial"
        ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
        bool(true)
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(1) {
          [0]=>
          string(10) "assessment"
        }
      }
      [2]=>
      array(4) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(40) "Collaborative Learning"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(7) "partial"
        ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
        bool(true)
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(2) {
          [0]=>
          string(13) "collaborative"
          [1]=>
          string(8) "learning"
        }
      }
      [3]=>
      array(4) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(41) "Creative Teaching & Learning"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(7) "partial"
        ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
        bool(false)
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(1) {
          [0]=>
          string(8) "learning"
        }
      }
      [4]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(17) "Critical Thinking"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [5]=>
      array(4) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(22) "Deep Learning"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(7) "partial"
        ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
        bool(false)
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(1) {
          [0]=>
          string(8) "learning"
        }
      }
      [6]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(11) "Imagination"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [7]=>
      array(4) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(29) "Independent Learning"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(7) "partial"
        ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
        bool(false)
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(1) {
          [0]=>
          string(8) "learning"
        }
      }
      [8]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(15) "Problem-Solving"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
    }
    ["tags"]=>
    array(5) {
      [0]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(8) "feedback"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [1]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(7) "process"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [2]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(10) "reflection"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [3]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(21) "relationship-building"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [4]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(23) "structured conversation"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Arts-Based Learning

Assessment Reimagined

8 Jan 2019