Inclusion

SEND Green Paper 2022 – Some Critical Insights

Perspectives on the SEND Green Paper from five academics and education practitioners working at the University of Plymouth and Plymouth Marjon University who have expertise in special educational needs and disabilities , social mobility and inclusive education
Image from Plymouth Institute of Education

The launch of the SEND Review Green Paper (HM Government, 2022a) raised significant concerns as to the future direction of SEND provision and potential implications for children, families, schools, communities and support services.

These include the de-professionalisation of Special Educational Needs Coordinators (SENCos), the disempowerment of parents and children, the question of post-16 provision, a proposed increase in bureaucracy and a lack of reference to inclusive leadership .

It also raises the issue of The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) provides not only that children with disabilities should not be discriminated against but also that they should be able to participate in the general education system.

Background to SEND policy and provision

We agree with the words of the then Education Secretary Nadhim Zahawi (HM Government, 2022a), “Too many parents and carers of children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) feel they aren’t heard. They are frustrated, and often feel there is no one held accountable for their children’s outcomes in the different parts of the system”. The Government’s review (HM Government, 2022a) has identified the following three key challenges facing the SEND and alternative provision system:

  1. The challenges and negative experiences families and professionals have in navigating the SEND system and alternative provision is not a positive experience for too many children, young people and their families
  2. Outcomes for children and young people with SEND or in alternative provision are consistently worse than their peers across every measure
  3. Despite the continuing and unprecedented investment, the system is not financially sustainable

<--- The article continues for users subscribed and signed in. --->

Enjoy unlimited digital access to Teaching Times.
Subscribe for £7 per month to read this and any other article
  • Single user
  • Access to all topics
  • Access to all knowledge banks
  • Access to all articles and blogs
Subscribe for the year for £70 and get 2 months free
  • Single user
  • Access to all topics
  • Access to all knowledge banks
  • Access to all articles and blogs