Effective School Support for Disadvantaged and Vulnerable Pupils

This Estyn report identifies effective school practices to support disadvantaged and vulnerable pupils. This may include work funded by the Pupil Development Grant (PDG).

The best practice case studies in the report show how successful providers support these pupils and make a difference to their wellbeing and achievement.

Create an account to read this article

£7.00+ VAT

One-off purchase

Purchase and Download today

Register for free

No Credit Card required

Register for free
Access to 3 free articles
Free TeachingTimes Report every month

array(8) {
  ["distinct_key"]=>
  string(10) "post#39634"
  ["title"]=>
  string(38) "Is wellbeing the root of all learning?"
  ["categories"]=>
  array(1) {
    [0]=>
    string(10) "Leadership"
  }
  ["url"]=>
  string(62) "https://www.teachingtimes.com/iswellbeingtherootofalllearning/"
  ["post_date_timestamp"]=>
  int(1331811864)
  ["objectID"]=>
  string(12) "post-39634-0"
  ["_snippetResult"]=>
  array(2) {
    ["excerpt"]=>
    array(2) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(193) "In the
country’s most
comprehensive
research on the
effectiveness of
PSHE, Barbara
Stiell investigates
just how successful
the programme
has proved to be in
meeting the needs
of young people."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "none"
    }
    ["content"]=>
    array(2) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(404) "... primary and secondary schools in England, andexploring – in particular – the ways that some primary andsecondary schools have used PSHE education to address theneeds of more vulnerable pupils in disadvantaged areas.PSHE education – the bigger pictureIn the recent Schools White Paper (November 2010)1 TheImportance of Teaching, the Coalition Government statedthat ..."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "full"
    }
  }
  ["_highlightResult"]=>
  array(4) {
    ["title"]=>
    array(3) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(38) "Is wellbeing the root of all learning?"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "none"
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
    }
    ["excerpt"]=>
    array(3) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(193) "In the
country’s most
comprehensive
research on the
effectiveness of
PSHE, Barbara
Stiell investigates
just how successful
the programme
has proved to be in
meeting the needs
of young people."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "none"
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
    }
    ["content"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(5676) "81Vol 3.6School Leadership Todaywww.teachingtimes.comEveryChildMattersPSHEPersonal, Social, Health and Economic (PSHE) education dealswith the social and economic realities that affect children andyoung people in their everyday lives – now, and in the future.PSHE education’s importance is in helping a young personbecome life-ready and work-ready, and therefore sits alongside other coreacademic skills pupils acquire through school. The real-life relevance ofPSHE education is particularly marked in more disadvantaged areas wherethe greater challenges at home and in the community mean that meetingthe social, economic, health and wellbeing needs of young people is evenmore pronounced.This article outlines some of the findings from independent researchconducted by Sheffield Hallam University on behalf of DCSF (now DfE)Is wellbeingthe rootof alllearning?In thecountry’s mostcomprehensiveresearch on theeffectiveness ofPSHE, BarbaraStiell investigatesjust how successfulthe programmehas proved to be inmeeting the needsof young people.Strand ElementPersonal wellbeingDiet/nutrition and healthy lifestylesDrugs, alcohol and tobacco (DAT) educationEmotional health and wellbeingSafety educationSex and relationships education (SRE)Economic wellbeingand financial capabilityEnterprise educationPersonal finance/financial capabilityCareers education (secondary schools only, statutory)Work-related learning (secondary schools only, statutory)82Vol 3.6School Leadership Todaywww.teachingtimes.comEveryChildMattersPSHE in 2010, mapping the delivery and effectiveness of PSHEeducation in primary and secondary schools in England, andexploring – in particular – the ways that some primary andsecondary schools have used PSHE education to address theneeds of more vulnerable pupils in disadvantaged areas.PSHE education – the bigger pictureIn the recent Schools White Paper (November 2010)1 TheImportance of Teaching, the Coalition Government statedthat:‘Children can benefit enormously from high-qualityPersonal Social Health and Economic (PSHE) education. GoodPSHE supports individual young people to make safe andinformed choices. It can help tackle public health issues suchas substance misuse and support young people with thefinancial decisions they must make.’But given its marginal status in relation to the NationalCurriculum, PSHE education is not generally judged to beof ‘high quality’ in most schools, suffering from patchycoverage, delivery and engagement2, and of course there areconcerns that this may have a particular impact on schools in more deprived areas.But what is PSHE education? Table 1 below outlines the elements in the (non-statutory) PSHE education curriculum. As can be seen, it covers a wide range of areasrelating to both ‘personal’ and ‘economic’ wellbeing – all of which are to some degreeor other important to the lives of all children – including those in more deprivedcircumstances.Table 1: PSHE education curriculum elementsThe studyThe Sheffield Hallam University study – conducted in spring and summer 2010 –included surveys of over 900 primary schools and 600 secondary schools in England,and was followed up with in-depth case studies with 14 schools in five local authorities,which involved interviews and focus groups with 260 individual teachers, schoolgovernors, school improvement partners, local authority (LA) advisors and consultants,pupils and parents. Most of the discussion in this article focuses on the findings fromthese case study schools.Three of the nine primary case study schools and two of the five secondary casestudy schools were in areas of deprivation where a significant proportion of pupilsexperienced social disadvantage. These commonly included schools with a highmobility of pupils and mid-year admissions, sometimes associated with increasingnumbers of asylum seekers and refugees; poorer attendance and attainment; higherlevels of pupils with learning difficulties and on free school meals (FSM); and highnumbers of pupils with poor emotional and behavioural development. The schools’wider local contexts were often characterised by those we spoke to (although thisIt can help tackle publichealth issues suchas substance misuseand support youngpeople with the financialdecisions they mustmake.“”83Vol 3.6School Leadership Todaywww.teachingtimes.comEveryChildMattersPSHEwas not always possible to verify) as having high levels of unemployment, domesticviolence and family breakdown, teenage pregnancy, underage drinking, anti-socialbehaviour/low-level disruption, widespread drug use, and gun, knife and gangcultures. Respondents we spoke with identified some of these issues – in particular thelack of employment opportunities – with both low expectations and low aspirations.To varying degrees, these schools saw PSHE education as an important vehicle forexploring and addressing these issues directly and indirectly through curriculumcoverage and provision of additional pupil support.However, it was not only in areas of deprivation or disadvantage where teachersidentified vulnerable pupils who had significant issues that required support throughPSHE education and other approaches and interventions. For example, low self-esteemwas identified as a particular problem for pupils in one relatively affluent semi-ruralprimary school, where parents commuted long distances to stressful jobs, had financialworries and associated breakdown in family relationships. The findings from this schoolalso seemed to be relevant, and so they are also discussed"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "full"
      ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(3) {
        [0]=>
        string(10) "vulnerable"
        [1]=>
        string(6) "pupils"
        [2]=>
        string(13) "disadvantaged"
      }
    }
    ["categories"]=>
    array(1) {
      [0]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(10) "Leadership"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Leadership

Is wellbeing the root of all learning?

15 Mar 2012

array(8) {
  ["distinct_key"]=>
  string(10) "post#39248"
  ["title"]=>
  string(41) "ecj 2.4 Creating the climate for learning"
  ["categories"]=>
  array(1) {
    [0]=>
    string(9) "Inclusion"
  }
  ["url"]=>
  string(65) "https://www.teachingtimes.com/ecj24creatingtheclimateforlearning/"
  ["post_date_timestamp"]=>
  int(1318605061)
  ["objectID"]=>
  string(12) "post-39248-0"
  ["_snippetResult"]=>
  array(2) {
    ["excerpt"]=>
    array(2) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(232) "The aim of PSHE was to reduce the deficit
that disadvantaged children face. But has it
been successful? Bernadette Stiell looks
at the findings of the most comprehensive
research ever carried out into the subject in
England"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
    }
    ["content"]=>
    array(2) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(369) "... and in the future. PSHEeducation’s importance is in helping a young person becomelife-ready and work-ready, and therefore sits alongside othercore academic skills pupils acquire through school. Thereal-life relevance of PSHE education is particularly marked inmore disadvantaged areas where the greater challenges athome and in the community ..."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
    }
  }
  ["_highlightResult"]=>
  array(4) {
    ["title"]=>
    array(3) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(41) "ecj 2.4 Creating the climate for learning"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "none"
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
    }
    ["excerpt"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(232) "The aim of PSHE was to reduce the deficit
that disadvantaged children face. But has it
been successful? Bernadette Stiell looks
at the findings of the most comprehensive
research ever carried out into the subject in
England"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
      ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(1) {
        [0]=>
        string(13) "disadvantaged"
      }
    }
    ["content"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(5684) "Vol 2.4 n www.teachingtimes.comPolicy/ResearchEvery Child Journal40The aim of PSHE was to reduce the deficitthat disadvantaged children face. But has itbeen successful? Bernadette Stiell looksat the findings of the most comprehensiveresearch ever carried out into the subject inEnglandCreating theclimate forlearningPersonal, Social, Health and Economic (PSHE)education deals with the social and economicrealities that affect children and young people intheir everyday lives – now, and in the future. PSHEeducation’s importance is in helping a young person becomelife-ready and work-ready, and therefore sits alongside othercore academic skills pupils acquire through school. Thereal-life relevance of PSHE education is particularly marked inmore disadvantaged areas where the greater challenges athome and in the community mean that meeting the social,economic, health and wellbeing needs of young people iseven more pronounced.This article outlines some of the findings fromindependent research conducted by Sheffield HallamUniversity on behalf of DCSF (now DfE) in 2010, mapping thedelivery and effectiveness of PSHE education in primary andsecondary schools in England, and exploring – in particular –the ways that some primary and secondary schools have usedPSHE education to address the needs of more vulnerablepupils in disadvantaged areas.PSHE education – the bigger pictureIn the recent Schools White Paper (November 2010)1 TheImportance of Teaching, the Coalition Government statedthat:“Children can benefit enormously from high-qualityPersonal Social Health and Economic (PSHE) education. GoodPSHE supports individual young people to make safe andinformed choices. It can help tackle public health issues suchas substance misuse and support young people with thefinancial decisions they must make.”But given its marginal status in relation to the NationalCurriculum, PSHE education is not generally judged to beof ‘high quality’ in most schools, suffering from patchycoverage, delivery and engagement2, and of course there areconcerns that this may have a particular impact on schools inmore deprived areas.But what is PSHE education? Table 1 below outlines theelements in the (non-statutory) PSHE education curriculum.As can be seen, it covers a wide range of areas relating towww.teachingtimes.com n Vol 2.4Policy/Research Every Child Journal41both ‘personal’ and ‘economic’ wellbeing – all of which areto some degree or other important to the lives of all children– including those in more deprived circumstances.Table 1: PSHE education curriculum elementsThe studyThe Sheffield Hallam University study – conducted in springand summer 2010 – included surveys of over 900 primaryschools and 600 secondary schools in England, and wasfollowed up with in-depth case studies with 14 schools infive local authorities, which involved interviews and focusgroups with 260 individual teachers, school governors, schoolimprovement partners, local authority (LA) advisors andconsultants, pupils and parents. Most of the discussion in thisarticle focuses on the findings from these case study schools.Three of the nine primary case study schools and twoof the five secondary case study schools were in areasof deprivation where a significant proportion of pupilsexperienced social disadvantage. These commonly includedschools with a high mobility of pupils and mid-year admissions,sometimes associated with increasing numbers of asylumseekers and refugees; poorer attendance and attainment;higher levels of pupils with learning difficulties and on freeschool meals (FSM); and high numbers of pupils with pooremotional and behavioural development. The schools’ widerlocal contexts were often characterised by those we spoketo (although this was not always possible to verify) as havinghigh levels of unemployment, domestic violence and familybreakdown, teenage pregnancy, underage drinking, anti-socialbehaviour/low-level disruption, widespread drug use, and gun,knife and gang cultures. Respondents we spoke with identifiedsome of these issues – in particular the lack of employmentopportunities – with both low expectations and low aspirations.To varying degrees, these schools saw PSHE education as animportant vehicle for exploring and addressing these issuesdirectly and indirectly through curriculum coverage andprovision of additional pupil support.However, it was not only in areas of deprivation ordisadvantage where teachers identified vulnerable pupilswho had significant issues that required support throughPSHE education and other approaches and interventions.For example, low self-esteem was identified as a particularproblem for pupils in one relatively affluent semi-rural primaryStrand ElementPersonal wellbeingDiet/nutrition and healthy lifestylesDrugs, alcohol and tobacco (DAT) educationEmotional health and wellbeingSafety educationSex and relationships education (SRE)Economic wellbeing andfinancial capabilityEnterprise educationPersonal finance/financial capabilityCareers education (secondary schools only, statutory)Work-related learning (secondary schools only, statutory)Vol 2.4 n www.teachingtimes.comPolicy/ResearchEvery Child Journal42school, where parents commuted long distances to stressfuljobs, had financial worries and associated breakdown in familyrelationships. The findings from this school also seemed to berelevant, and so they are also discussed here.Meeting pupils’ needs?To some degree, all schools had adapted their PSHE educationcurriculum to meet the needs of their pupils, and"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "full"
      ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(3) {
        [0]=>
        string(10) "vulnerable"
        [1]=>
        string(6) "pupils"
        [2]=>
        string(13) "disadvantaged"
      }
    }
    ["categories"]=>
    array(1) {
      [0]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(9) "Inclusion"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Inclusion

ecj 2.4 Creating the climate for learning

14 Oct 2011

array(8) {
  ["distinct_key"]=>
  string(10) "post#91083"
  ["title"]=>
  string(97) "The Four Pillars of Support Missing  For Children With Special Educational Needs During Covid -19"
  ["categories"]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(5) "Blogs"
    [1]=>
    string(9) "Inclusion"
    [2]=>
    string(9) "Inclusion"
  }
  ["url"]=>
  string(93) "https://www.teachingtimes.com/four-pillars-of-support-covid-19-and-special-educational-needs/"
  ["post_date_timestamp"]=>
  int(1608206084)
  ["objectID"]=>
  string(12) "post-91083-0"
  ["_snippetResult"]=>
  array(2) {
    ["excerpt"]=>
    array(2) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(156) "Sonia Blandford describes the needs of children with Special Educational Needs during the Covid Crisis, which she laments, have been disgracefully neglected"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "none"
    }
    ["content"]=>
    array(2) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(407) "... well-differentiated planning, personalised provision and interventions. This will lead to securing the greatest impact on pupil outcomes and support, review and refine provision for vulnerable and disadvantaged pupils that ensures accelerated progress, narrowing the attainment gaps within the school against national outcomes. Intervention and small group catch up should ..."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "full"
    }
  }
  ["_highlightResult"]=>
  array(6) {
    ["title"]=>
    array(3) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(97) "The Four Pillars of Support Missing  For Children With Special Educational Needs During Covid -19"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "none"
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
    }
    ["author"]=>
    array(1) {
      [0]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(15) "Sonia Blandford"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
    }
    ["excerpt"]=>
    array(3) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(156) "Sonia Blandford describes the needs of children with Special Educational Needs during the Covid Crisis, which she laments, have been disgracefully neglected"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "none"
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(0) {
      }
    }
    ["content"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(5645) "During the summer term, the COVID-19 pandemic catapulted educators across all phases of education in delivering the entirety of their programmes digitally with the majority of students studying remotely.  The exception being children and young people with Education Health and Care Plans (EHCPs), and those considered by their schools to require additional special educational needs support.  The reality at this time is that there were a significant number of children and young people identified with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) who did not attend school between March and July.‘Strange, challenging, unprecedented’ are wordsthat have been used to describe this period, difficult enough to understand forthose who do not have any diagnosed needs. In some settings, there were reports of students engaging and learning with the remote approach more than during face to face lessons. In others, there was real concern over equity in terms of engagement and access[1] with as low as 16% of disadvantaged students engaging in learning. There were also reports of the disengagement of a significant number of young people because of a lack of equipment, variable connectivity, and space, but also because the approach and resources provided were a challenge to them[2]. In addition, there were reports indicating that the lockdown was impacting on both students and educator’s mental health and wellbeing[3].On return to school in yeargroup bubbles, the school day remains short, less differentiated, andchallenging for all teachers[4].  The reality of non-attendance in the summer,the delay in restarting schools for all children, and the ongoing impact ofCOVID-19 on school closures in the autumn is captured by the NFER[5].  For some children and young people identified with SEND there has been an improvement in the amount of contact between schools and parents through this period although parents do not feel this is enough. The evidenceEvidence is mixed here.  Where schools have adopted a fully inclusive approach 100% of families in their communities have been contacted, with the inevitable positive results.  Parents, carers, siblings, and extended family members have embraced learning, supporting students with their range of life experience and learning. In contrast, the SEND Jungle survey[6] found that 75% of schools had not completed a SEND risk assessment through this period. Only 16% of parents felt the work they received was appropriate to their child’s learning need. 34% reported increased anxiety. The Education Policy Institute[7] reported that they had concerns about off rolling and exclusion rates as schools reopened and asked for some clear guidance from government. It is well known the importance of early year’s provision in enabling the best possible start especially for more disadvantaged families. 34% of providers did not expect they could survive into next year. In more affluent areas only 24% felt they were at risk.As CEO of a third sector organisation, our priority is toprovide a form of support and infrastructure that supports professionals at atime when we need to develop the ability to step into the world of vulnerable childrenand young people. Our research found that impactful Achievementfor All partner schools developed staff and student agency and expertise framedby four pillars[8]:  This approach would build capacity inall schools and settings.Pillar 1:  Parents’ and carers’engagement in a child’s learning is an important factor inimproving their outcomes and achievements. Parent and carer engagement thatremoves barriers to learning can drive forward pupils’ perseverance, motivationto learn, and confidence.  As schoolsreturn continue with increased disruption it is important to build on theenhanced communication with parents and find strategies for more systematicenhancement.Pillar 2:  Provision for closing the gap by developing quality-first teaching through well-differentiated planning, personalised provision and interventions. This will lead to securing the greatest impact on pupil outcomes and support, review and refine provision for vulnerable and disadvantaged pupils that ensures accelerated progress, narrowing the attainment gaps within the school against national outcomes. Intervention and small group catch up should be integrated into the main provision by providing the support that enables even the most challenged to be included daily. Have we got the courage, the support, the ideas and the tools to re-ignite learning, re-motivate learners and re-engage with (the hardest-to-reach) families? Do we need to do something different? Do we need to change curriculum intent and implementation to have a different impact? Ofsted’s new inspection framework[9] supports such ambition if INTENT – IMPLEMENTATION and IMPACT align.Pillar 3: Building core strength and resilience for all by helping vulnerable children and young people toidentify and reach their goals and ambitions, by buildingon the latest neuroscience and psychological research as effective strategiesto improve cognitive, non-cognitive development (essential life skills) as wellas resilience and self-efficacy. Pillar 4: Digitalskills: technology is opening new frontiers in terms ofaccelerating learning and personalising the education experience Increasedunderstanding of virtual and blended learning in each education setting wouldtransform the progress of all learners. The next issue of Every Child"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "full"
      ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(3) {
        [0]=>
        string(10) "vulnerable"
        [1]=>
        string(6) "pupils"
        [2]=>
        string(13) "disadvantaged"
      }
    }
    ["categories"]=>
    array(3) {
      [0]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(5) "Blogs"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [1]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(9) "Inclusion"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [2]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(9) "Inclusion"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
    }
    ["tags"]=>
    array(1) {
      [0]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(14) "Special Needs."
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Blogs

The Four Pillars of Support Missing For Children With Special Educational Needs During Covid -19

17 Dec 2020

array(8) {
  ["distinct_key"]=>
  string(10) "post#88646"
  ["title"]=>
  string(58) "The Challenges Facing Schools and Pupils in September 2020"
  ["categories"]=>
  array(2) {
    [0]=>
    string(10) "Leadership"
    [1]=>
    string(20) "Leadership Briefings"
  }
  ["url"]=>
  string(89) "https://www.teachingtimes.com/the-challenges-facing-schools-and-pupils-in-september-2020/"
  ["post_date_timestamp"]=>
  int(1599561157)
  ["objectID"]=>
  string(12) "post-88646-0"
  ["_snippetResult"]=>
  array(2) {
    ["excerpt"]=>
    array(2) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(128) "Over half of teachers estimate that the learning gap between disadvantaged pupils and their peers has widened."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
    }
    ["content"]=>
    array(2) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(393) "... be treated as a long-term endeavour rather than a ‘quick fix’. In future episodes of partial lockdown, ‘blended learning’ must ensure equity for all pupils. Effective remote learning needs to be coupled with high-quality in-school teaching for vulnerable pupils, children of keyworkers, disadvantaged pupils and pupils with ..."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "full"
    }
  }
  ["_highlightResult"]=>
  array(6) {
    ["title"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(67) "The Challenges Facing Schools and Pupils in September 2020"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
      ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(1) {
        [0]=>
        string(6) "pupils"
      }
    }
    ["author"]=>
    array(1) {
      [0]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(12) "Raspal Singh"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
    }
    ["excerpt"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(128) "Over half of teachers estimate that the learning gap between disadvantaged pupils and their peers has widened."
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(7) "partial"
      ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(2) {
        [0]=>
        string(6) "pupils"
        [1]=>
        string(13) "disadvantaged"
      }
    }
    ["content"]=>
    array(4) {
      ["value"]=>
      string(5816) "This NFER research investigates the impact of Covid-19 on mainstream primary and secondary schools in England and focuses on the challenges schools will face from September when they open to all pupils.It considers the extent to which pupils are behind in their curriculum learning in relation to teachers’ normal expectations for the end of the school year; the impact of Covid-19 on the ‘disadvantage gap’; the need for catch-up support from September; and the logistical issues and resource implications of opening schools fully while taking measures to reduce the risk of infection. It also considers schools’ experiences of offering remote learning from March, and blended learning (remotely and in-school) from June, in order to inform decisions about the support and resources that schools will need in the event of future lockdowns.Jointly funded by Nuffield Foundation and NFER, the study is based on a weighted sample of almost 3,000 school leaders and teachers across over 2,200 mainstream primary and secondary schools in England. Main Findings:Nearly all teachers estimate that their pupils are behind in their curriculum learning, with the average estimate being three months behind. Over half of teachers estimate that the learning gap between disadvantaged pupils and their peers has widened. Teachers in the most deprived schools are over three times more likely to report that their pupils are four months or more behind in their curriculum learning than teachers in the least deprived schools. Reasons related to the provision of remote learning include: diminishing levels of pupil and parent engagement over time; and a continuing lack of interactive remote teaching approaches. Reasons related to in-school provision for some pupils from June include: a skew of teaching resource to in-school provision to meet the demands of social distancing. This took teaching resources away from pupils based at home; a reduced quality of in-school teaching due to the restrictions of social distancing (almost three quarters of teachers did not feel able to teach to their usual standard); and low levels of pupil attendance, especially among Pupil Premium and Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) pupils. The main reasons for low attendance were parental safety concerns. Although many schools were supplying IT equipment to their staff, over a third of teachers were providing their own laptop or computer, and three-fifths either supplied their own camera/video equipment or had no access to this at all. Over one quarter (28 per cent) of pupils had limited access to IT at home. This is a particular issue for schools serving the most deprived pupil populations. Teachers estimate that 44 per cent of their pupils are in need of intensive catch-up support. These estimates are much higher in the most deprived schools and in schools serving the highest proportion of pupils from BAME backgrounds. Senior leaders’ top priorities for September are to provide support for pupils’ emotional and mental health and well-being (81 per cent); to re-engage pupils with learning (64 per cent); and to settle them into school (63 per cent). Academic catch-up activities are most likely to take the form of small-group or one-to-one sessions. While most senior leaders predict they will find it at least ‘somewhat manageable’ to open to all pupils in September while taking measures to minimise the risk of infection, many identify a need for additional staffing and resources for cleaning, protective equipment and IT. The percentage of teachers and senior leaders intending to leave the profession has reduced by more than half compared to previous estimates. However, schools plan to reduce their initial teacher training (ITT) placements in 2020/21. This is of concern, given the large increase in the number of applications for ITT in 2020.Implications for government, schools and those that support them:Parents need reassurance that schools are safe. The Government’s national advertising campaign will need to be convincing and may need to continue through the autumn in order to assuage current levels of parental concern. Schools may need help from local authorities (LAs) and trusts with the management of non-attending pupils. The Government’s additional funding for catch-up support is welcome, but schools need extra resources for cleaning regimes and for staffing, to ensure social distancing is managed appropriately. The Government needs to work with school leaders and ITT providers to tackle the challenge of an increase in ITT applications, coupled with a reduction in training places in schools. When inspections resume, Ofsted may need to modify expectations of schools providing a broad and balanced curriculum while social distancing is in force. With the exception of pupils working towards examination specifications, catch up needs to be treated as a long-term endeavour rather than a ‘quick fix’. In future episodes of partial lockdown, ‘blended learning’ must ensure equity for all pupils. Effective remote learning needs to be coupled with high-quality in-school teaching for vulnerable pupils, children of keyworkers, disadvantaged pupils and pupils with unsuitable home learning environments (rather than specific year groups). Schools need government support to prepare for remote learning in a local lockdown. In particular, they need a clear steer on safeguarding. In the absence of this, many schools will avoid teaching and learning methods involving interaction with pupils. Schools need to take an evidence-informed approach to"
      ["matchLevel"]=>
      string(4) "full"
      ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
      bool(false)
      ["matchedWords"]=>
      array(3) {
        [0]=>
        string(10) "vulnerable"
        [1]=>
        string(6) "pupils"
        [2]=>
        string(13) "disadvantaged"
      }
    }
    ["categories"]=>
    array(2) {
      [0]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(10) "Leadership"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [1]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(20) "Leadership Briefings"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
    }
    ["tags"]=>
    array(2) {
      [0]=>
      array(3) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(12) "Non homepage"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(4) "none"
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(0) {
        }
      }
      [1]=>
      array(4) {
        ["value"]=>
        string(15) "pupils"
        ["matchLevel"]=>
        string(7) "partial"
        ["fullyHighlighted"]=>
        bool(true)
        ["matchedWords"]=>
        array(1) {
          [0]=>
          string(6) "pupils"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Leadership

The Challenges Facing Schools and Pupils in September 2020

8 Sep 2020

Cookie	Duration	Description
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional	11 months	The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy	11 months	The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.

Create an account to read this article

£7.00+ VAT

Register for free

Cookies